ETF – Page 52 – Miami Crypto Coin

Former JPMorgan, Barclays execs on why crypto jobs attractive even in bear market

Post author:MiamiCrypto
Post published:August 17, 2022
Post category:Banks barclays Cryptocurrencies Dubai ETF France Germany Interview Job JPMorgan & Chase UAE

Former traditional finance veterans are debuting a crypto career at the crypto ETF issuer 21Shares despite the bear market.

Metaverse housing bubble bursting? Virtual land prices crash 85% amid waning interest

Post author:MiamiCrypto
Post published:August 8, 2022
Post category:Decentraland ETF MANA Meta.Metaverse SAND Sandbox SNAP Virtual Land

The virtual real estate market is crashing despite a McKinsey report predicting a $5 trillion market by 2030.

KuCoin crypto exchange debuts USDT-dominated NFT ETF

Post author:MiamiCrypto
Post published:July 29, 2022
Post category:Cryptocurrencies Cryptocurrency Exchange ETF kucoin Tether

KuCoin's new investment product aims to increase the liquidity of and access to leading nonfungible token collections such as BAYC.

Charles Schwab’s asset management arm launches crypto-linked ETF

Post author:MiamiCrypto
Post published:July 29, 2022
Post category:Business Charles Schwab Cryptocurrencies ETF Investments

Schwab said the investment vehicle will offer exposure to firms involved in mining and staking as well as those developing blockchain-based apps or distributed ledger technology.

Sub-$22K Bitcoin looks juicy when compared to gold’s market capitalization

Post author:MiamiCrypto
Post published:July 18, 2022
Post category:Boeing Cryptocompare ETF Funds gold inflation Markets silver

BTC’s market cap is way smaller than gold's, but the percentage of Bitcoin held by institutional investors suggests that the current pricing reflects an excellent discount.

SEC extends window to decide on ARK 21Shares spot Bitcoin ETF to August

Post author:MiamiCrypto
Post published:July 12, 2022
Post category:ARK Bitcoin ETF Investments Regulation SEC

J. Matthew DeLesDernier, assistant secretary for the SEC, said it had extended to allow for “sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change and the issues raised therein.”