Artists aim to thwart AI with data-poisoning software and legal action
With AI-generated content continuing to evolve, the advent of data-poisoning tools capable of shielding an artist’s works from AI could be a game changer.
Auto Added by WPeMatico
With AI-generated content continuing to evolve, the advent of data-poisoning tools capable of shielding an artist’s works from AI could be a game changer.
The battle continues as artists amend a lawsuit previously struck down by court authorities against major AI companies who have allegedly violated creative copyright laws.
Grimes’ manager Daouda Leonard and music platform Slip.stream explain the importance of artists owning their data and controlling their rights to stay ahead in their approach to AI.
According to the research, blockchain provides several game-changing benefits for intellectual property licensing and management.
Amid myriad legal accusations surrounding its AI services, Google stands its ground, vowing to protect its users.
Universal Music Group, Concord Publishing and ABKCO Music & Records alleged that Anthropic “unlawfully” copied and disseminated “vast amounts of copyrighted works” from the publishers.
Google explicitly stated that only seven products fall under this legal protection, excluding Google’s Bard search tool.
The Author’s Guild opened a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging misuse of copyrighted material in training of its AI models.
In a lawsuit against Sarah Silverman and other authors Meta claims its AI system does not create copyright infringing material.
Can Ansay the founder of AI streaming and marketplace platform Musixy.ai, says AI-generated music is revolutionary and brings efficiency and lowers costs to productions.